|
Printer Friendly Version With Images
by
Hermann A. Peine Ph.D. and Louis S. Allen, M.D.
Adapted from the book
What is Narrative Therapy?
by
Alice Morgan *
Narrative therapy is a non-blaming approach to human problems.
It uses a respectful focus on people’s ability to externalize
problems. By these means they are not considered as the “problem”.
By creating some space around people, they are better able to use
their abilities, including skills of living and self-knowledge,
to deal with their life’s challenges. Individual values, attitudes,
competencies, perceptions, and goals are brought forward as a part
of alternative stories and used to reframe problem stories, thus
minimizing the saturated problem discourses which befall people
as part of their individual lives. Curiosity and a willingness to
ask questions, coupled with a willingness to be co-active, authentic
and transparent in the story’s co-conceptualization and reformulation
are essential components of this intervention process.
Journaling stories can be a form of narrative practice for those
who follow some basic rules of the process. These general rules
relate to the defining of life events that are significant to us.
After this individuals are to link them in sequence across time,
while formulating a minor or major plot or theme for them (meanings
and significance). Running narratives of one’s life are littered
with dozens of continuing stories from the heroic to the mundane.
The multiple stories people are living at any one time differ and
are acted out in the broader context of one’s family, community,
and culture. For example, some of our quest stories are filled with
successes and determination, while other stories of being wounded
may show failure, dysfunction, or have tragic endings. An individual’s
dominant stories often have far reaching influences on their daily
living and even on the path of their life. Narrative interventions
looks for even covered up stories which may aid, by highlighting
them and bringing them forward, the destructive influence of overwhelming
problems and overworked storylines.
Many people forget how complex and often interesting the sequence
of one’s life can be. Many people have been so conditioned
by negative sound bites that they start thinking of their own story
in such a fashion. Those disposed to such thin descriptions (blaming,
criticisms, labels) for their actions or self- identities (which
they have created or which others may have created for them by others),
representing the oppression of mainstream society. Such self-descriptions
allow little space for the complexities, contradictions and particularities
of life. They tend to be surface descriptions, a pathologizing (causal
labeling) abstract if you will, which can camouflage real feelings,
intentions, attitudes, desires, and the complex array of human emotions
and interactions. Such thin stories often lead to thin conclusions
and thin labels of what problems may be. People often label them-selves,
or are labeled, as ‘bad’, ‘a troublemaker’,
‘looser’, or ‘lazy’. Sometimes such labels
(thin descriptions) often hide strengths and cover up a more richly
and thickly described account of one’s life, which could and
should have been brought forth.
Either by being taught or by self-learning, individuals who discover
to form rich and thick descriptions are often able to identify alternative
stories or unique outcomes having far different consequences than
the thin ones they often face on a daily basis. Rich descriptions
about one’s experiences involve the expressions of fine detail
of the story-lines of a person’s life. A person can become
the author of his own enriched stories leading to new alternative
ways of dealing with problems. Some personal stories may require
co-authorship, a coach or friend, who can offer reflection, active
listening and clarification. A greater understanding of the restorying
process of problematic stories of other’s lives can be transporting.
We can view a process by which individuals draw forth more preferred
versions and meanings of their stories from a rich repertoire of
experiences and sparkling events that are also part of their stories,
but have been less attended to in the past. New possibilities may
come from viable solution understandings (knowledges) and personal
resources that are more easily integrated into a rich life story
and the new sense of self. A greater understanding of the richness
of one’s’ life may come through the story thickening
by providing the details and particularities of the major and minor
themes of one’s life.
The initial goal of the narrative process is to name the problem(s)
within its (their) social context(s), and then begin the process
of externalizing the problem(s). By externalizing a problem, individuals
are often able to separate themselves from the problem and are more
easily prepared to find alternative stories for dealing with their
individual relationship to the problem. Problems are less rooted
in cement when they are externalized, being less ingrained in ‘who
the person is’. Once a person is able to see an alternative
for the problem story and begins speaking of ‘the problem
as an influence’, or in relation, to it (the externalized
influence) as opposed to being it, they often find significantly
more stories for problem solutions come to the four-front.
Things such as feelings, problems between people, cultural and
social practices, fears, addictions, and other ills can be externalized.
All externalized stories are about the problems that are outside
individuals and the effects they have on the individual. What does
“the fear,” “the addiction,” “the
anger or guilt,” or” the depression” have to say
about how you live your daily life? A rich story of the problem
area, by personifying it or using it as a metaphor, may ask questions
about the problem’s tricks, tactics, way of operating, intentions,
beliefs and ideas, plans, or what keeps it hanging around. It’s
rules, desires, motives, techniques, deceits or lies it uses to
do its dirty business, are explored.
Since many individuals are experts at internalizing problems,
it may be helpful to understand why one should be able to externalize
them. It may also provide insight into why externalizing problem
stories and conversations may increase alternative solutions and
find sources for new developing stories.
| Internalized: |
Externalized: |
| Person is the problem |
Problem is the problem |
| What is ‘wrong’ with person |
Problem external to self-identity |
| Actions come from personal core or self |
Actions learned over time |
| Often need other experts to explain behaviors |
People invited to identify their own interpretations of self |
| Problems linked to self-identity |
Problems separate from core self |
| Downplay social context |
Highlight social context |
| Usually based on thin conclusions about self |
Based on rich descriptions of lives and relationships |
| Based on internal influences |
Looks at cultural, social-political stories influencing people |
| Focus on negative aspects of differences that may lead to
feelings of discrimination |
Celebrates differences |
| A part of self-identity learning to cope with problems |
Re-negotiation of relationships with problems |
| Professionals seen as experts |
Individuals experts over themselves |
| Learning new tools for problem fixes |
Communal growth using discovered skills and knowledge present
in individual |
| Language used “I am …” |
Language used “It is….” |
| Much focus on problem |
Looking for stories outside of problem |
Evaluating the history of the problem as well as spaces where
it grew, developed and resides opens up consideration for other
alternative stories. A problem looked at over time often shows it
to be less static and more changing, having more or less influence
in relation to one’s life at different times or during different
situations. Exploring what has been its history and what are the
effects of the problems on the person’s life in multiple contexts
i.e. view of self, view of differing roles of self, hopes and dreams,
work, social life, spirituality, moods, physical health, and daily
life, can be very helpful. Asking what are the effects of the problem’s
influence on the person’s life within the problem story is
also a good strategy. One might also inquire as to when the problem
works or does not work, when it shows itself and when not, and why
the problem is evaluated by the individual in the way they do?
Problems survive with the support of ideas, beliefs, principles
and practices promoted by dominant cultural discourses, and by their
effect on the environment and the physical self. The helper’s
role is to help restructure the problem story as based within the
beliefs, ideas and practices of the broader culture in which the
problem story occurs and at the same time bringing forth the impact
of the person’s preferences, hopes, dreams, ideas and values
in relationship to the problem.
Problem stories, especially those in deep cement, must be replaced
with other stories having a rich context, with many views from diverse
sources. Brought up must be instances where events ran counter to
the problem’s influence. These striking outcomes may form
the foundation of alternative stories. These unique outcomes may
be based on past or present actions out of the norm or may be based
on a change in plans, actions, feelings, what it said, the quality
of ones work, desires or dream, thoughts, beliefs, commitment, and
talents and abilities. These variations from the dominant story
are often overlooked in thin histories (stories), because thin histories
tend to focus on the obvious, the dominant theme, and not on the
subtle aberration, no matter how positive it may have been. Problem
saturated texts eclipse anything good. Look for the silver linings
encircling dark clouds.
- How have you kept the problem from becoming worse?
- Describe the times the problem is manageable?
- How do you cope when things require the problem not get in
the way?
- What kind of things are more important to you than your problem
and when have you followed your impulses not to let the problem
get in your way?
The exploration of alternative outcomes may be the door to new
and different stories about people’s lives and relationships.
By tracing the history of unique outcomes they can be placed in
the foreground of people’s awareness and match people’s
abilities for re-creating these outcomes in new stories that can
lead to changes in future actions. The details of the unique outcome
must be rich with history in setting, circumstances, actions, and
consequences. Sequential events, including outcomes, must be explored
in detail. Resistances to continuation of the unique outcomes must
be explored in the shaping of the new story. Details of exploration
might also include but not be limited to the following:
- Desires, wishes, preferences
- Personal values
- Relationship qualities
- Personal skills and abilities
- Intentions, motives, plans, purposes
- Beliefs and values
- Personal qualities
As explorations of aspects of the unique outcome in relation to
the above variable progresses, an alternative story may develop
having an alternative plot (meanings). The person might be asked
questions about what personal skills the person has for development
of their new story that a loved one would not be surprised at. Searching
for:
- Motives
- Reflections by others about the character
- New interpretations
- Details of what is said, felt and done by another can add the
spice
to make the developing story richer.
Once the alternative story has been formulated, it should be named
i.e. strength and survival instead of worthlessness.
One now has both negative and positive stories with them named in
front of them and the time is ripe for more richly describing the
new story.
The integration of an alternative story as a replacement for an
existing (often problematic story) uses a number of strengthening
procedures. These procedures need not be used sequentially, but
may be utilized as desired by the individual and those assisting
i.e. therapist or helper.
- Finding witnesses and an audience for the new story. This is
the basis for many support groups for all types of human ills.
- Using re-remembering conversations to enrich the presentation
of the alternative new story. Who would validate the new story
by personal experience with the person? Such is a way to link
to the past, near present and future vital social supports These
recollections may also be related or unrelated, real or imaginary,
and may include animals, toys, pets, places symbols or objects.
Questions for Re-remembering
- Who would be most surprised to hear you say this?
- Who else would know what you stand for?
- To be able to learn more about this skill, who else might
be able to tell me?
- Use reciprocal sharing or linking to others lives by finding
(re-membering) individuals who would share the same preferences,
commitments, beliefs or values as the new story. The reciprocal
is just as powerful asking the one being remembered, what place
they hold in them, the memory of their friend and how its made
them different.
- Make therapeutic documentation of important achievements related
to the new story through documents, declarations, certificates,
notes, videotapes, lists, and pictures.
- Learn to write therapeutic letters to significant others including
the therapist. The health provider, therapist, or helper will
often model such letter writing, and can assist in naming the
problem and its history, summarizing progress made to date, and
validating and naming new told stories.
- Integrate new rituals and celebrations into the new story.
- Find a support group of individuals for your new story and
constantly have your new story reinforced.
* What is Narrative Therapy?
- An easy to read introduction - By Alice Morgan, Dulwich
Centre Publications, Adelaide, United Kingdom, 2000.
|